But the console "settings" as a whole can not be directly compared to the PC settings of low, medium or high. It has been confirmed from multiple other sources that the console versions run mostly at settings equivalent to medium settings on the PC. Because of consoles they did not have a need to put millions of extra dollars into a smaller market such as making proper 64BIT software for PC gamers, which is HUGE when done correctly for the headroom it can give.īut end of the day Consoles screwed technology for the PC gamers. I know we have other effects that are highly complex, and expensive to complete. INF tweak would enable this on a DX9 system. That is a main highlight, most effects that were used in DX10/11 were actually just "ON/OFF" switches that a simple. You have additional effects.mainly tessellation which isnt being used to great effect currently in video games, but eventually will. DX9 = 1 flood gate, while DX11 = many similar gates. And it even ran better too(DX9), due to the mature nature of it.ĭX11 brings optimization that can give 10-30% extra fps to a similar DX9 area. I'd rather take DX9 maxed, over MEDIUM on any of the other direct x, and you know what end of the day the higher physical settings make the difference, very little to do with DX today.ĭX10 was actually one of the biggest scams in the PC industry, it brought nothing new to the table when it came to visuals that DX9 couldnt replicate just as well.if not better. Never read that statment anywhere and even on the heart of the crysis community (M圜rysis) no one speaks such foolishness. WTF are you smoking making that statement? Sounds like alot of BS that has been madeup.
Thats NEVER been the case, even with DX10.ĭX11 allows more headroom on a GPU, effects are minor improvements, one main effect being the free geo bump (Tessellation). FanboyPunisher 3918d ago (Edited 3918d ago )
0 kommentar(er)
